Mysticism vs. Rationalism Redux: NFL All-22 Footage to be Released to the Public

by rabbifink on June 15, 2012 · 20 comments

The NFL has decided to give the fans the Holy Grail of NFL Football, the All-22 video.

What is this Holy Grail? It is the film that NFL coaches receive. It is different than broadcast footage because the broadcast only shows a small part of the game. The quarterback is the main focus of the broadcast and the viewer at home does not see what the wide receivers are doing nor do the viewers get a full grasp of how the defense covers the receivers or disguises blitzes. In short, the broadcast footage is very limited in what it allows the viewers at home to see.

ESPN got a very small percentage of All-22 for the NFL Matchup show. But in general, we the public, have never seen enough All-22 to understand the very complex game of the NFL completely.

The All-22 footage gives the viewer a full view of all 22 players on every play. It shows how the schemes look before the play and how the players move through the play. It is the definitive source of all NFL information. It shows everything.

For years, the NFL has resisted giving away the All-22 film to the public. Their reasoning was that the public cannot handle the information. They are not initiated in the ways of NFL football like the coaches are and they will misinterpret the information. This will open the players and coaches to unwarranted criticism. Further, the broadcasters do have the All-22 during the game. That’s how they sound so smart. If people see what the broadcasters see, they will see behind the curtain and realize they are not that smart after all, they just have access to more information.

Now that will all change. We will all be able to see the All-22 footage. The NFL no longer holds the keys to the Ferarri. We all do now.

To me, is representative of a fundamental change in the way we approach information in 2012. Knowledge, wisdom, and information are expected to be accessible to all. They are expected to be available to anyone who wants it. This is the generation of Wikipedia. This is the generation of Google. This is the generation of free information.

The Encyclopedia Britannica was a giant leap in making information accessible to many people. But they still needed to shell out a ton of cash to buy a full set or they could mosey on to the library and read it there. But it was not easy accessible to anyone and everyone. That’s the old model. Wikipedia is the new model. Free information.

The NFL has caught wind of this. They want to please their young fan base. Eventually they caved to pressure and now the most valuable NFL data is available to the public.

What’s this got to do with Judaism? Mysticism? Rationalism?

One of my favorite Torah scholars is Chacham Jose Faur. One of his favorite theories about the relationship between Maimonidean rationalism and mysticism / kabbalah is very relevant to this decision by the NFL.

Chacham Faur believes that the core of the battle between rationalism and mysticism is the accessibility of knowledge. In the mystical view, kabbalah is received wisdom that comes from great scholars and is imparted to great scholars only. It is not accessible to the masses as it is deemed too dangerous or too esoteric for the common people to grasp. Laws can be changed based upon this extremely private knowledge base and it can even usurp revealed Torah found in the Talmud. It is so powerful, yet so few can gain entry into the kabbalah club. It takes years of Torah study and personal growth to be worthy of hearing this mystical knowledge.

In sharp contrast, we find the teachings of Maimonides. It was his desire to turn this model on its head. Knowledge was to be accessible to all. The Mishneh Torah was written so that everyone who could read was able to access the core text of Judaism. It no longer required a process by which one had to prove himself to be worthy of knowing the law. It was available to everyone. Free information.

This was one of the primary arguments against the Mishneh Torah. It made things too easy.

But to a rationalist, it is impossible to justify keeping wisdom locked away from the public. So Maimonides followed in the footsteps of R’ Yehuda HaNassi and made Torah accessible to all.

This tension exists today as well. On one hand we have groups that try to make kaballah more accessible to the masses. But most orthodox Jews find this unacceptable. On the other hand, we have Daas Torah die-hards who are buying into the same structure as the mystics of the medieval era did with regard to policy setting and halachic decisions. The Daas Torah skeptics are more universalist with their approach to Torah and thus believe that everyone has access to all of Torah, not just a select group of Torah giants.

It is harder than ever to maintain the model of the mystics. The NFL finally gave in to the side rationalism and granted the public access to their information. In the orthodox Jewish world a similar struggle is starting and is likely to continue for the next few years.

Link: WSJ

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t think it could be done but you’ve successfully compared the A22 video to the Mishneh Torah. Congratulations. (Now, if only “Yad” hachazakah had a gamatria of 11 or 22, instead of 14 – you’d REALLY be on to something.)

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      Thanks.

      Maimonides wasn’t a gematria guy anyway…

  • ahg

    Interesting Post. But problematic in that it would seem that even the rationalist Maimonides did not feel that all concepts of Torah and G-d should be readily accessible.

    Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Madah 2:12 The Sages of the early generations commanded that these matters [Ma'aseh Merkavah] should not be explained except to a single individual. He should be a wise man, who can reach understanding with his knowledge. In such an instance, he is given fundamental points, and an outline of the concepts and an outline of the concpepts is made known to him…. The concepts are extremely deep, and not everyone has knowledge to appreciate them….

    Sounds awfully like kabbalah that is received wisdom that comes from great scholars and is imparted to great
    scholars only. It is not accessible to the masses as it is deemed too
    dangerous or too esoteric for the common people to grasp.

    While I like your overall message, I don’t think we can use Maimonides as an example of someone who felt all should be accessible to the masses.

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      Maimonides held that referred to scientific wisdom which could only be understood by a scholar in scientific matters. anyone who was versed in science and Torah could learn it.

      • ahg

        anyone who was versed in science and Torah could learn it.
        Hence, not available to the masses. We could stipulate that the average day school educated H.S. graduate today would qualify and Maimonides was only excluding the more ignorant masses of his day, but I don’t think this is clear.

        We don’t really know what Maimonides would consider well versed. Hypothetically,he might have required yadin yadin semicha and a PhD equivalence in one of the natural sciences. If so, that would limit its study to a very small group that invested years of study to be worthy.

        As an aside; When I was a teenager, I used to think that when I reached 40 (that’s the age they told us was the minimum in yeshiva), the first thing I would want to do is pick up a book on the Zohar and start reading this secret knowledge. As I come closer to that day now, I really have no interest, having reached the conclusion that the rational path is more constructive.

  • Barwah

    The difference between Maimonides view that only wise men should be given the keys to understanding the deepest concepts is that these people were not charged and did not take it upon themselves to institute new laws based on their knowledge.

    The point that Rabbi Fink is making is that the “Kabbalists” of the 13th and 14th century and beyond instituted new laws — “al pi Kabbalah” — that they introduced to the masses, thus making those not following these laws feel inferior and even marginalized. This ability gave the “Kabbalists” POWER over people

    The Maimonidean paradigm of transferring knowledge to a select few was not so they could wield power and invent new laws.

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      This is Chacham Faur’s view. Have you seen this expressed elsewhere?

      • Barwah

        Not really. Maybe Heinrich Graetz in his volume 3 of the History of the Jews. Hakham Faur quotes him somewhere.

        • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

          Ahhh. I was hoping…

          • Barwah

            Actually, it is in Graetz’s volume 4. You can find it online for free from Google books.

          • Barwah

            Actually, it is in Graetz’s volume 4. You can find it online for free from Google books.

  • DeSafran

    “This is the generation of free information.” Information is not free; just the ways of paying for it may make it seem free. I’m a librarian. We pay thousands of dollars for databases. There are content suppliers that charge for information. Would you rather pay directly for information or pay through what advertisers want you to see? Library databases have millions of articles that Google will never be able to index or show you.

    • http://profiles.google.com/onthemainline Mississippi Fred

      You’re only partly right. First of all, thousands of passwords are readily accessible online to anyone who cares to look deep enough. Secondly, even though Google can’t index them, tools like Google Scholar and even the search engine on the Hathi Trust site can and do bring this info closer to one’s attention. There’s no question that there is orders of magnitude more information available easily and quickly to people, enough that it is a game changer.

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      What Fred said.

  • http://profiles.google.com/onthemainline Mississippi Fred

    Rationalism in religion is as much an esoteric doctrine as mysticism.

    That said, the information thing is important. I pretty much guarantee that 30 years ago something as easy to find out online as the controversy over the Zohar’s origin was entirely unknown to the vast majority of people with identical profiles of those, today, who are well aware of it. I once posted about what I called Semi-talmidei chachomim or semi-am haratzim ( http://onthemainline.blogspot.com/2007/01/semi-talmidei-hakhomim-or-semi-amei-ha.html ) as a unique, modern challenge to rabbinical authority. Just look at something like the Avodah list. There are accessible, constant discussions about the ins and outs and even history of halacha that were unthinkable not long ago. These can’t help but have an effect.

  • http://profiles.google.com/holyhyrax Holy Hyrax

    The sheer amount of information out there is amazing. Simply amazing. At the same time, there is so much information out there, that sometimes out I feel the easy access to it has caused a lot of laziness in people finding good information. Usually, you will argue with someone and they throw you in some link that supposedly helps their case. That link may also be poorly researched in the first place as well.

    All things being said, it really is amazing, but I wouldn’t confuse access to information with wisdom.

  • http://profiles.google.com/holyhyrax Holy Hyrax

    >Eventually they caved to pressure and now the most valuable NFL data is available to the public.

    Did the fans really want it? What would be the reason? Whether at the stadium or on TV, the attention is usually on the main play….which is what the quarterback is doing, not the rest.

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      The fans have been asking for it for years.

      The whole point of this film is to see what else is happening while the camera is focused on the quarterback. Were receivers open downfield? Why? Why not? What did the quarterback see?

      Are you a fan of the NFL?!

  • Steve

    This was what was at the core of the original Chasidim- Misnagdim Machlokes. Seems like the Misnagdim still havent learned (the Litvish) and the Chasidim have forgotton what “got them there”.

  • http://twitter.com/isaacson isaacson

    I think you are separating two things which are actually a unified whole. Mystics don’t hold information back based on a lack of cognitive ability but rather based on ascetic practice. There is no fa’heir to attend a shiur in Beit El, but no one will teach you anything if you are not a completely observant Jew. In short, Judaism does not separate information out as a separate category, which is what you seem to be implying in your post.

    As to Rebbi Yehuda and making information freely accessible, I would argue the exact opposite. Aggadic material is a way for the sages to encode philosophic and mystical material deemed inappropriate for the masses into a terse cryptic language decipherable only by the most brilliant minds. Furthermore the Mishna itself lists an injunction not to teach esoteric material in public (see Chagigah chapter 2).

Previous post:

Next post: