Beautiful Photos of Charedi Wedding in Israel in the New York Times

by rabbifink on February 16, 2012 · 6 comments

Photo: Oded Balilty

One of the starkest differences between orthodox Jews and others can be observed at a wedding. The orthodox Jewish wedding is really two weddings. One for the men and one for women. They are in the same place but in today’s society, they eat and dance while completely separated. It can seem strange. But in another sense it can be quite beautiful.

The beauty comes from seeing a large gathering of people, usually orthodox Jewish wedding parties are attended by several hundred people, all joined together for one holy purpose. Marriage is a very important milestone in orthodox Judaism and the awe, reverence, and respect according the event creates a very special atmosphere.

The unity of the event can also be seen superficially by the uniform standards of dress. Everyone dresses conservatively and they kind of blend together. When one pulls back, it can be visually stunning. Especially to an outsider.

An outsider had a unique opportunity to photograph a superstar wedding in Israel. Oded Balilty is a Pulitzer Prize winning photojournalist. He lives right around Bnei Brak but his world is very different. Take a look at his perspective from behind the lens of this world that is closer to his own than he realizes. The photos are on the NY Times website today and they are amazing. His commentary is excellent as well.

Check out the photos on the NY Times Lens Blog: So Close, Yet So Far

Related posts:

  1. Beautiful Photos of Hoshana Rabbah at Pacific Jewish Center | The Shul on the Beach
  2. A Jerusalem Wedding
  3. A Beautiful Peek Into Our History
  • Anonymous


    One of the starkest differences between orthodox Jews and others can be observed at a wedding. The orthodox Jewish wedding is really two weddings. One for the men and one for women. 

    Well … I guess I’m not orthodox in that case. We only had 1 wedding.

    • http://twitter.com/alexphilo7 Philo

      Agreed – that was an odd sentence to put up. Would have been fine with the insertion of the word “Ultra”

  • http://www.facebook.com/azigraber Azi Graber

    I never like when we assume that what makes sense to us or seems beautiful to us (althoug this issue doesnt seem so at all to me) also seems so to outsiders.

    I think people viewing these photos would either be apathetic or wondering what the hell is wrong with every single person appearing in those pictures (and feeling bad for that bride as wel.)

    Even with an explanation it isnt beautiful.

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      Yes. Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But the NYT deemed these photos worthy of public consumption because they feel they are beautiful in at least one sense of the word. I agree.

      I think most people who are outsiders to orthodox Judaism will see the photos for what they are: A peek inside a mysterious world as seen by a world class photographer. It sure looks better than the albums on Only Simchas…

  • Mayer

    Nice pictures. One question: why offer any legitimacy, for those of us not in a chassidic community, for the “custom” of separate seating? We had only one wedding, ourselves. 

    • http://finkorswim.com E. Fink

      It was not commentary or legitimacy. It was just observation of current mores.

Previous post:

Next post: