Kiddush Club: (noun) a slang term applied wherever an informal group of people leave a synagogue’s sanctuary during Jewish services on Shabbat (Saturday) morning to congregate, make kiddush (frequently over liquor) and socialize. Participants often leave services during the Haftorah reading or the sermon. – Wikipedia
Rabbi Shmuley Yanklowitz has a scathing indictment of kiddush clubs in The Jewish Week. The Orthodox Union has banned kiddush clubs from their shuls as well.
Citing “some studies” that indicate alcoholism as high as 10-15% for Jews in general, Rabbi Shmuley argues that kiddush clubs are a destructive force in our synagogues. It seems that in Rabbi Shmuley’s kiddush clubs, men stagger back into shul completely drunk. It seems to Rabbi Shmuley that Jewish teens abuse alcohol because of kiddush clubs. His writing describes the kiddush clubs as being “exclusive groups” in “back rooms” reminiscent of the back rooms in a Las Vegas casino or illegal high stakes poker game.
I have been to many kiddush clubs in many shuls. None fits the description of Rabbi Shmuley. None.
There is no place for drunkenness in shul. It is prohibited to pray while inebriated. Men who get drunk during kiddush club have serious problems that can’t and won’t be solved by writing scathing diatribes against kiddush club or even by banning them.
I have previously written about the problem of insular communities denying internal problems. I agree that alcohol abuse may be one of those issues. (See: Social Issues Raised by the Recent Tragedy)
But, I disagree that kiddush clubs must be discouraged or banned.
Going to shul on Shabbos is a religious and social experience. Many people enjoy the social aspects of communal prayer. I believe that this element of prayer within Judaism was a stroke of genius by the rabbis of the Talmud. Making a religious experience such as prayer intertwined with a social experience is a great way to balance two basic human needs.
Shabbos services are quite long. I don’t think they need to be shorter nor do I think anyone should feel bound to stay inside the sanctuary for the duration of the services. Further, most men come to shul not having eaten breakfast as per the halachic requirement that one not eat before morning services.
A kiddush club is just a more organized way of taking a few minute break from shul. I don’t think there is anything terribly wrong about that. Like anything, the kiddush club can’t cancel out the religious experience of attending shul. But to say that it automatically turns one’s Jewish education into a waste of money is unfair and unwarranted.
On the contrary, if a kiddush club gives people some extra motivation to come to shul, it is a classic example of “מתוך שלא לשמה בא לשמה” – the Talmudic concept of using ulterior motives to do the right thing. Similarly, if a shot of whiskey and some herring helps one enjoy the services a bit more, it is hard to see why it should be banned. When one is basically fasting until midday, a kiddush club can be a great pick-me-up during the long Shabbos services.
The kiddush clubs that I have participate in, were friendly, quick and pretty harmless overall. There is no reason all kiddush clubs can’t be the same as those. There may be a few horrible kiddush clubs, but if there are, the people who make them horrible are the problem, not the clubs themselves.
In short, in my experience, kiddush clubs are not as seedy or nefarious as Rabbi Shmuley alleges. Some clubs may be as bad as he claims. Even in those cases, it seems to me that the problem is the participants are their drinking problems as a whole, not the actual club. Teens may wish to experiment with alcohol. I know I did. Parents and community members need to be responsible for the teens in their lives. Eliminating kiddush clubs won’t translate into teens not being enticed by alcohol. Making the claim, based on “some (unnamed) studies” that Jewish alcoholism is at 10-15% has no relationship to kiddush clubs. A tiny percentage of Jews go to shul; an even smaller percentage participate in kiddush clubs. It is hard enough to see correlation, let alone causation.
Shul needs to be more fun, more engaging, more social, if a kiddush club contributes to these goals I can’t see why they should be completely shunned. People always need to be responsible about what they do. A hallmark of the non-Charedi world is the willingness to let people make their own choices and give them the tools to make those choices. Not to limit those choices with bans and polemics.
There are some actual benefits to the typical kiddush club. In my opinion, if they are done right they are worth keeping around.
Link: The Jewish Week
Related posts:


