My Visit With Judith Clark at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility

by rabbifink on July 29, 2010 · 9 comments

This past winter I wrote an article about Felony Murder for a student run Law Journal at Loyola Law School. (Read: I’ve Been Published! My Article On Felony Murder Is Online)

In researching the subject of Felony Murder I was introduced to the case of Judith Clark by Professor Gilda Zwerman who accompanied me to visit with Judith. Judith Clark has a website all about her crime, time served and the way she has rehabilitated her life while in prison. (Link: http://www.judithclark.org)

On Monday I had the opportunity to spend a couple hours with her in prison. It was very powerful.

First, my overall impressions of the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility:

The prison experience at Bedford Hills contrasted greatly with my experience at “Twin Towers” in Los Angeles (largest jail in the USA). At Twin Towers there is a lot of intake and outtake. The inmates are constantly moving around, the entire facility is indoors and there is almost no sunlight anywhere. Bedford Hills is a sprawling campus with sunlight and grass. It gives it a totally different feel.

Also, the inmates had an different temperament from the inmates at Twin Towers. The women of Bedford Hills seemed pretty pleasant, there were a lot smiles and hugs and friendliness. At Twin Towers it was very much the opposite.

The coolest thing about Bedford Hills was their nursery / summer children’s program. They have great child care for children born while their mother’s are incarcerated. Even better is the summer program. Children stay in the neighborhood and come from 9-5 every day to spend the day with their mothers. The prison provides a nice outdoor area for them to play and hang out with their mothers and I got a great first-hand view of the benefits of a program like this. The kids were having such a great time being with their mothers.

On to Judith:

The first thing I noticed was that I could not stop smiling while talking to her. She has such a great energy and infectuous disposition that you just find yourself smiling the entire time you are with her. We talked for a long time about the crime and her Judaism and her daughter and her appeal (which she won but was later overturned for technical reasons) and her famous writing club and her pursuit of multiple degrees and her close relationship with the previous warden at Bedford Hills.

In short, we had a great time talking.

What was clear to me, was her regret for being involved with a radical group and her sincere effort to change as a person. I don’t think she is the same person she was 30 years ago. I do think that she is an incredibly strong woman with the ability to help inspire and change others. Unfortunately, she is stuck behind bars.

Her sentence was harsh. She pretty much asked for a harsh sentence during the trial. But she was young, immature and infatuated with a movement. That person is not in prison. That person has transformed into a new person who could do no harm the way she is now.

We put people in jail for a few reasons. Deterrence,  incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution.

30 years in prison is a strong deterrent.

Judith Clark is not a dangerous criminal, there is no need to incapacitate her anymore.

Judith Clark is rehabilitated. I can attest to that.

Isn’t 30 years long enough for retribution? Retribution for driving a getaway car?

Seeing her in there breaks my heart.

But with my heart broken, I was once again inspired by Judith. Just before my visit was over she said “If I died tomorrow how would I feel about my life? I’ve had a good life. It was severely limited by the walls of this prison, but I accomplished a lot and I am proud of who I am.

Isn’t that what we all wish we could honestly say?

Related posts:

  1. Judy Clark is on the Cover of the NY Times Magazine
  2. An Interesting Alternative to Prison
  3. My Visit to the Museum of Tolerance at the Simon Wiesenthal Center
  • Izzy

    I am trying to reconcile this post with your post regarding Rubashkin, and your relative sympathy to Judith Clark vs. Rubashkin. The best that I can come up with is that you (presumably) never met Rubashkin, and certainly didnt face him incarcerated.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      Reread the Rubashkin posts.

      I am not in favor of incarceration for Rubashkin. In fact, I signed a petition to get him a lenient sentence.

      I am against the claims of anti-semitism and the excuses people make for him and his lack of remorse and his failure to apologize and the false claim that white collar crime is victimless and the failure of the frum community to “learn” from Rubashkin that stealing is bad and will get you in trouble.

  • Izzy

    I reread your Rubashkin posts, but could not find where you stated that you were “not in favor of incarceration for Rubashkin.” The closest that I saw was were a couple sentences where you said you felt terrible for him, as you would any crminal sentenced to prison, and that you thought 27 years was harsh. These points were imbedded in posts about him that were decidedly unsympathetic to him in tone and substance.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      Tone shmone.

      The unsympathetic tone is not about whether I agree with his sentence. It is about the factors I mentioned in the last comment.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      I did not say that I said in a post “I am not in favor of incarceration for Rubashkin”. What I am saying is that in those posts there is no indication that I am in favor of incarceration for Rubashkin.

      • Izzy

        Sorry, I misread your comment above.
        When I read your Rubashkin posts, I see you laying out point-by-point, why although you feel he was punished harshly, all the reasons why you dont think that punishment was unearned. Would you agree with that description?

        In contrast, in the post above, you describe how wonderful and repentant Judith Clark is, while glossing over what she actually did (“What was clear to me, was her regret for being involved with a radical group”). I had to click on her site to read the story of what she actually did.

        Can you see why that would come off as more sympathetic to her than him?

        • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

          My friend, these 2 situations are extreme opposites of the spectrum. The comparisons are getting silly.

          Clark has served 30 years in prison. She admits wrongdoing, expressed remorse, wishes to help others rehabilitate and is stuck in an unfortuntate legal position due to her mistakes in filing a timely appeal. Her co-defendants are almost all out of prison already and she had the longest sentence of all her co-defendants despite a low level role in the crime.

          Rubashkin has a machine working for his release. The machine does not acknowledge any criminal activity. The machine foists upon the public an idea (anti-semitism) and the public buys it, forgetting the crime, forgetting his lawyer denied any such notion and worst of all, completely pulling the wool over the public about the entire case. I have heard THE MOST RIDICULOUS assertions about the Rubashkin case. All I set out to do was be honest and hope and pray that he gets off – but he gets off as a crook, not a civil rights victim.

  • Izzy

    “…and is stuck in an unfortuntate legal position due to her mistakes in filing a timely appeal.” You make it sound like she missed a filing deadline by a few minutes, rather than completely boycotting her trial and not appealing for another 25 years or so.

    “She admits wrongdoing, expressed remorse…” As far as I can tell from her website, it was 20 years before she expressed any remorse for her involvement in a crime which left 3 people dead. That omission can hardly be explained away as a youthful indescretion.

    “…these 2 situations are extreme opposites of the spectrum.” Finally, we agree on something! I will leave it to you readers do some reasearch regarding their causes, and make a determination regarding their relative merits.

  • Pingback: An Interesting Alternative to Prison | Pacific Jewish Center | Rabbi

Previous post:

Next post: