The Whales Are Mounting A Counter Attack!

by rabbifink on February 24, 2010 · 13 comments

I am sure you have already heard the news. If you have not, here goes.

Today, a killer whale named Tilikum at Sea World Orlando killed a trainer. Yes. A whale. An animal that has no instinct to kill a human, killed a human, IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE! That was certainly more than the spectators bargained for…

You can read all about it all over the place, try the NY Times article here.

I’ve been thinking about this horrible incident all day.

Because I am a human being I mourn the untimely loss of one of our own.

Because I am a Rabbi I thought about whether zoos have a place in Jewish law.

Because I am a Law Student, and working at the California Court of Appeals, I thought about the potential liabilities involved.

Because I am not a “fan” of zoos or animal exhibits, I continue to wonder “what’s the point?”. And that is what I am going to write about here.

Animals belong in the wild. You want to go see animals? Go visit them in their home town. Don’t bring them to my home town and cage them up so people can gawk at them. Sure, there is educational value in learning about animals, but is that sufficient cause to lock animals up in a place that somewhat resembles their natural habitat?

I know, I know, we need to learn about animals so that we can understand our planet and how we relate to the ecosystem and we need to protect animals that are losing their natural habitats etc. etc. etc…

We can do that all in other ways. We have the resources to study animals in their environment.

Zoos hearken back to a time when Man thought Himself invincible and the world to be at His mercy. I think we know better know. Man is part of an intricate universe. We can’t overstep our bounds.

Who in their right mind thinks that an orca that is accustomed to swimming miles on end day after day is comfortable in a big fish tank? It is a miracle they haven’t revolted yet! I feel terrible for the trainer. Not just because she was killed by a killer whale, but because she probably thought that the animal was her friend. She probably had developed feelings for the animal. Most trainers do. I have heard from many trainers that they “love” their animals. But the thing is, animals don’t love like people do. Animals don’t reason or use logic. They can be trained to suppress their instincts, but they can always revert to their natural behaviors. I feel bad for the trainer because she probably thought the killer whale would never harm her.

Maybe I just don’t enjoy seeing animals in a zoo enough to see the value, but it seems hard to justify in my eyes. The danger to humans is clear and I believe that animals belong in the wild.

In Jewish law, an animal does not have “rights”. However, a human has responsibilities toward animals. We are not permitted to abuse animals. We are not permitted to cause animals any pain or suffering. We are only permitted to hunt for food (by most authorities) and not for sport. In my view, zoos are sport. Caging animals so that we can have fun seems like an abuse of animals. And we have a responsibility to treat animals with respect and care.

I would much prefer to watch the Planet Earth series (which you should DEFINITELY buy, click here) at home, than see animals caged in a zoo.

Just think, another life would have been saved too.

Related posts:

  1. Oops! Apparently Giovanni Ramirez Didn’t Attack Brian Stow
  2. Johnny Weir Gives Into Bullies and Changes His Fur Costume
  3. Kosher Supervision and Ethics Supervision
  • http://israelimom.org IsraeliMom

    I have a HUGE problem with old-fashioned zoos where animals are caged in small cages with no concern for their needs.

    I don’t think all zoos are the same though. I think the lions in the Ramat Gan Safari are handled very well (I’ve been on a private tour with their head keeper once), same goes for the other free-roaming animals there.

    My concern is with animal welfare. Not with out own discomfort at perceived misery, which is often a projection of our own feelings. As a human, you’d be stressed out of your skull from being “gawked” at. Not necessarily the same if you’re a shark in a large aquarium. Your issue as an animal would be that of lack of a large enough territory to fit your needs.

    Bottom line, it’s good to care about animals and to have a heart for them. The best thing you can do is fight against the mass-scale cruelty of the farming industry. Fight against battery coops for hens. Fight against castrating and de-horning calves with no anesthesia. Fight against the dozens of other horrendous practices applied so you can have your milk, eggs and meat. And IMO, at this stage, the way to go is vegan – simple and solely as a refusal to cooperate with the mass-scale torture of animals done on a daily and hourly basis. Zoo animals is such a negligent concern in comparison.

  • http://lifeinisrael.blogspot.com Rafi G

    Today, a killer whale named Tilikum at Sea World Orlando killed a trainer. Yes. A whale. An animal that has no instinct to kill a human, killed a human, IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE!
    uh, it was a KILLER whale….

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      They kill other mammals to eat. They do not kill humans in the wild. Look it up…

      • http://twitter.com/MarkSoFla Mark

        Don’t they live in a different habitat than humans? :-)

        If they lived in the same habitat, they likely would kill them as well.

  • Dov Kramer

    While care must be taken (and often is) to recreate their natural habitat, there is one additional aspect I think is worth mentioning.

    Not infrequently, an animal that would not have survived in its natural habitat is “saved” and brought to a zoo-type place to be healed and nursed back to health. With some species, the only ones in captivity are those who were saved. And by studying animal life in such setting, humans can better understand what needs to be done to help those in the wild.

    Is this worth capturing animals for our viewing pleasure? I’m not going to make a judgment. I will add, though, that the fourth plague, “arov” (a mixed multitude of animals), is said by our Sages of Blessed Memory to have been brought on the Egyptians because they forced us to go into the wild to capture animals for their zoos and circuses.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      Not infrequently, an animal that would not have survived in its natural habitat is “saved” and brought to a zoo-type place to be healed and nursed back to health.

      This does not have any innate connection to zoos where spectators visit. Heal the animals and send them back.

      • Dov Kramer

        Without the zoos, we wouldn’t have the resources/facilities to do that.

  • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

    Sure they would. There are people who would support it.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkSoFla Mark

    I have similar feelings regarding [most] pets. First objection is – “What right do we have to “keep” animals?”. Second, the way we keep them is often cruel, many of them we keep in cages just as zoos do, and even the ones outside a traditional cage are still encaged in an apartment or a house. Then, we often (almost always as most of us work outside the house during the day, and most of our kids attend school during the day) abandon them for long periods of time with no one of their own species or of ours to keep them company.

    And for another question of morality – is it moral to breed animals solely for our pleasure? I don’t mean the eating meat question (that’s been discussed before in many different forums), I mean breeding them for us to cage them and allow them out periodically to provide for our amusement.

  • http://voiceofoceananimals.blogspot.com/ manfromwi24

    Just ran across this, I myself am specifically interested in the field of Ocean animals and have a blog here that I started recently about them over here http://voiceofoceananimals.blogspot.com/. I’d ran across other articles about dangers of dolphins in captivity and such before this incident even ocurred, besides the general articles about human interference with the whales life. Obviously this incident is going to have big ramifications in either the continuation of major projects like seaworld and other exhibits, or at least the format. Ultimately wild animals are wild animals and we can’t control how they act or ultimately understand their behavior towards us, but I will say that this incident should in no way arouse a general dislike towards these creatures. As to whether or not whales or dolphins should be kept in captivity, I don’t think animals meant for the wild should be kept as pets, but I still don’t believe these animals are as hostile as what this incident would have some to believe.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      Thanks for stopping by.

      I agree wholeheartedly that these animals are not as hostile as these incidents would lead us to believe. Especially when they are still in the wild…

      Come by again soon.

      -ef

  • Offwinger

    I’ve had the opportunity to work in an aquarium that used to keep whales in captivity and stopped doing so (do to changing beliefs about what’s right), and I’ve had the opportunity to observe different kinds of whales and dolphins in several different countries. In one instance, I was even able to swim in the open ocean right near a pod of dolphins in a country that does it right in how they regulate commercial enterprises with the environmental concerns for the animals & the need for more research about these creatures. It was an amazing experience.

    Speaking of “hostility” makes very little sense when applied to the animal kingdom. Dolphins are essentially whales (there are marine biologists who’ll fight over the terminology whether dolphins ARE one category of whale or not – it’s not my point to get into that quibble). So I’m going to comment about dolphins and whales here.

    Dolphins in the wild are fairly unique in that they are KNOWN to kill for sport and engage in non-consensual group sex. We’d call these things murder and rape if they were people. They aren’t human, though, so it makes no sense to say this is hostile. There is no morality in a group of dolphins batting around a seal for fun. It’s unusual in the animal kingdom to find creatures that kill for play, sport, or fun (people do it too, of course – it’s called “hunting”). Yet these marine mammals do. Don’t be fooled by their high intelligence and ‘smiling’ faces – they can be very dangerous in certain circumstances.

    Dolphins and whales do not kill humans regularly in the wild, because people do not live in the ocean. So that proof doesn’t make any sense. Moose don’t regularly kill people in the wild to eat, but they are more fatal than bears if you do happen to come upon one. Different kinds of dolphins and whales have a different attitude toward people (curiosity, avoidance, etc.) and in some regions, they may be more or less habitualized to people. If you want to go swim near a pod of Orcas, let me know how that goes. They are likely to kill you out of curiosity or by accident even before they kill you on purpose. If you go whale-watch on a larger boat, the same Orcas will “play with” and “race” your boat. They are truly majestic creatures.

    As for captivity, sadly, many dolphins and whales who are brought into captivity will never be able to return to the wild and reunite with their pods. Fortunately, some can. But for those who can’t, that’s pretty much the only “good” reason for keeping them confined – if they have reached the point of not being able to survive without people.

    • http://www.americasbestzoos.com Allen Nyhuis

      Since you admit that you are “not a fan of zoos or animal exhibits”, I have a suggestion: Just don’t go to them! Don’t go and leave them for those of us who do love them — and love the animals in them.

      Allen Nyhuis, Coauthor: America’s Best Zoos

Previous post:

Next post: