<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Okay, Somebody Really Messed This Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/</link>
	<description>The Rabbi on the Beach at the Shul on the Beach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabbifink</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>rabbifink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Just a typo. Fixed it now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a typo. Fixed it now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>I was just curious if &quot;Ninety-Ninety-Nine&quot; was a typo. If not, why would the &quot;nineteen&quot; rule not apply to the year 1999 as it does for 1995 or 1950.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just curious if &#8220;Ninety-Ninety-Nine&#8221; was a typo. If not, why would the &#8220;nineteen&#8221; rule not apply to the year 1999 as it does for 1995 or 1950.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinky Londoner</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinky Londoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re at it, could they change it in Israel too?  It&#039;s not great for a Modern Hebrew student to have to work out one-thousand-nine-hundred-and-sixty-nine etc each time a date of birth is given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re at it, could they change it in Israel too?  It&#8217;s not great for a Modern Hebrew student to have to work out one-thousand-nine-hundred-and-sixty-nine etc each time a date of birth is given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Pat Kiernan made this point (mine, too) in an op-ed for Mediaite that got some attention here in NY last week. (Cited in NY Post, etc.)

http://www.mediaite.com/print/welcome-to-20-10/

I&#039;m still not sure where I stand on this. I&#039;m too used to saying &quot;two thousand&quot; to change, even though &quot;twenty&quot; might be more correct. Also, think what you want to be saying 700 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Kiernan made this point (mine, too) in an op-ed for Mediaite that got some attention here in NY last week. (Cited in NY Post, etc.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/welcome-to-20-10/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/print/welcome-to-20-10/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not sure where I stand on this. I&#8217;m too used to saying &#8220;two thousand&#8221; to change, even though &#8220;twenty&#8221; might be more correct. Also, think what you want to be saying 700 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabbifink</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>rabbifink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Wow.

Paul, you may very well be correct. I had not thought of that. It&#039;s all Kubrick&#039;s fault!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>Paul, you may very well be correct. I had not thought of that. It&#8217;s all Kubrick&#8217;s fault!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mc</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>I believe it started with 2001: A Space Odyssey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it started with 2001: A Space Odyssey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tesyaa</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>tesyaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>Efink, I think it&#039;s your fault.  Why didn&#039;t you say something at the time??? No one knew there was a problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efink, I think it&#8217;s your fault.  Why didn&#8217;t you say something at the time??? No one knew there was a problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabbifink</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>rabbifink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>I dunno, maybe twenty-oh-oh. Or Even two-thousand, but the next year should have been twenty-oh-one.

Wait, you seem awfully defensive - Is this your doing?? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, maybe twenty-oh-oh. Or Even two-thousand, but the next year should have been twenty-oh-one.</p>
<p>Wait, you seem awfully defensive &#8211; Is this your doing?? <img src='http://finkorswim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://finkorswim.com/2010/01/04/okay-somebody-really-messed-this-up/#comment-2661</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finkorswim.com/?p=1972#comment-2661</guid>
		<description>What, pray tell, would you have called 2000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, pray tell, would you have called 2000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

