Elul Begins With A Warning | Anonymous Bloggers Take Note: Google Knows Your Every Move

by rabbifink on August 21, 2009 · 11 comments

A little while back I contributed a decent post to DovBear that generated an impressive response from legions of commenters on DovBear. The post was a comparison of anonymous vs. onymous blogging.

I argued that by blogging about important things anonymously, they are less effective and only perpetuate the near censorship of right-wing Orthodox Judaism. Some went on to call anonymous blogging cowardly.

In the discussion that ensued I conceded that quite possibly, better conversation can be had anonymously and I admitted that for a blog like DovBear, the unfortunate reality is that anonymity is the preferable choice.

Something left undiscussed was the reality that DovBear is not anonymous. Google, who hosts his blog, knows exactly who he is, where he lives and presumably, has access to all his email, searches and web history. Until a few days ago, one may have assumed that their information was safe with Google.

Not anymore.

A New York State Supreme Court ruled that Google was compelled to reveal the identity of a blogger using Google’s Blogger software. The blogger is question had posted defamatory comments about a fashion model that negatively affected her career. The model sued Google to uncloak the anonymous blogger and the court held that Google must comply.

Some may think I herald this as a victory for onymous blogging. Not so. If one is not comfortable blogging onymously his privacy must be respected. I urge people to choose to blog onymously, I am not on favor of mandating it and banning anonymous blogging.

The Bray of Fundie has an interesting post about his opinion on the ramifications of this ruling which is worth reading. Click here to go to to his excellent blog called HaMavdil.

(This is just one more reason to self host one’s blog. Technically the owner of a Blogger blog is Google and it is their information to share or withhold. A self hosted blog cannot be “outed” by Google as the blog owner is the rights holder to the information on the blog.)

But what of the courts decision? How does this affect the blogosphere? Some are calling it the “end of anonymous blogging”. That may very well be the case, but a new anonymous medium (twitter?) will crop up and still give voice to the anony-addicts out there. So really, the voice of the anonymous will not be quelled it will just need to move its home base.

The prospect of Google sharing our information is more worrisome than anything else. Everything we do is being recorded by Google. That can seem very scary.

Yet, when we reflect on this idea we can ask ourselves, is it so strange to us that our lives are being recorded by Google? Is it such a foreign concept that our every movement has meaning and does not disappear into the oblivion of infinite time and space?

Of course it is not. Our Rabbis teach us “V’chol ma’asecha b’sefer nichtavim”. All our actions are recorded in a “book”. Obviously, this cannot be a real, leather-bound volume published by Harper-Collins. I understsand this to mean that each of our actions has cosmic ramifications. Whenever we act, it affects us and the world is affected. None of our actions are meaningless that they would go “unrecorded”.

This is what Elul and the High Holidays are about. Realizing that our decisions and choices make real differences and hopefully adjusting our lives accordingly to make good and true choices.

The court decision in favor of the fashion model comes at a great time. We can take stock and learn a lesson about what it means for our lives to “recorded”; what it means to live life with the understanding that everything we do matters.

At some point we all will need to face our life’s choices. Let’s make the right choices.

Related posts:

  1. Onymous Blogging
  2. Jewish Blog Round-Up July 5th 2009 Edition
  3. Authentic Judaism and Authentic Charity
  • Sheldon Liber

    Regardless of whether a blog author is disclosed, a worthy opinion or idea should be judged on its merit not on the source.

    In the case of an idea that’s merit is less clear, disclosure of the author may bring the blog more or less crediblity. In the absense of that disclosure it has less merit. By the same token there are times when an author (and the reader) might not want the source revealed because they prefer not to sway the argument in this fashion.

    Idea’s from the Torah are held to the highest level, but consider how some might view the same text if it were anonymous.

    The best example to consider is the ballot box. That must be secret to emcompass both notions — the ability to voice an opinion without fear of retribution and on the other side not so that no ones opinion carry greater weight than anyones elses.

    There are very serious reasons to allow for both instances, to disclose and not.

    In most instances disclosure is preferable. One should be willing to stand behind their ideas with the primary exception being the case where the resultant information results in self sensorship.

  • http://wwwjackbenimble.blogspot.com Jack

    Are you familiar with Orthomom?

    http://orthomom.blogspot.com/2007/10/orthomom-lawsuit-victory.html

    Good Shabbos.

    • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

      Gonna check out Orthormon, thanks for the link!

  • http://toratezra.blogspot.com dys

    I’m quasinonymous, and in any case, I don’t really attack anybody while blogging. So I’m not concerned for myself. Still, the ruling could have a chilling effect on the blogosphere, making it a far less interesting place.

  • http://toratezra.blogspot.com dys

    R Fink,

    Presumably, even if someone self-hosted their blog, the hosting service could also be compelled to reveal their info. There still has to be a server somewhere, and a company behind it.

  • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

    dys:

    That would be unprecedented as the hosting company “sells you the space” and it is your online storage space. Whereas Google “owns” your blog so whether the information is disclosed remains in their hands.

    • Arnold

      R Fink,

      You are mistaken. There is NO legal distinction in court between a Google and a private webhosting company providing space for your blog. The court can compel either (Google or your webhost) to reveal all data they have on their customer.

      • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

        You could be right.

        But Google has MUCH MORE information that my webhost. Right?

        • Arnold

          More likely a webhost has more data on you. Google only asks for your name. Its services are free, so no credit card. A webhost will ask for your name, address and credit card. Both will have the IP address’ you used to login (which will allow them to find out who owns the internet account you used to login to them.)

          In other words, there is no hiding. At the end of the day, the court can find out who you are.

          And frankly, if someone actually libels or otherwise damages another party under the cloak of anonymity, the court has a legitimate and legal responsibility to allow the infringed party to proceed with a claim against the alleged infringer. You cannot use internet anonymity to avoid your legal obligations.

          • http://finkorswim.com rabbifink

            Oh, I certainly agree with you. I don’t stand behind the cloak of anonymity and I have gone on the record asking anonymous bloggers to “come out”. My point here is that the anonymous bloggers are only anonymous so long as Google (or anyone else) hides them.

            By the way, Google has most of our emails and web searches as well. Google has everything.

  • Mark

    Wow, I just realized something. Google was created by God, all knowing, all powerful, and it even starts with the same two letters!

Previous post:

Next post: